Signs of hope in East Africa, as control campaign tames locust upsurge

first_imgSigns of hope in East Africa, as control campaign tames locust upsurge In this Q&A interview, FAO Senior Desert Locust Forecaster Keith Cressman and Cyril Ferrand, Manager of FAO’s Desert Locust response in East Africa, discuss progress made in containing the threat posed by the voracious pest in East Africa.What is the locust situation in East Africa right now?Cressman: At the moment, swarms are declining rapidly across the Horn of Africa thanks to the large-scale control operations mounted by governments and supported by FAO over the past 14 months and poor rains.Swarms in Ethiopia, Kenya and Somalia remain immature and continue to become smaller. Without rainfall, they will not mature and breed. The upcoming rainy season that is expected to be drier than normal should contribute to a further decline in locusts.So, there is cautious optimism that the upsurge is winding down in the Horn of Africa, especially if poor rainfall limits breeding this spring, and then equally poor rains occur during the summer in northeast Ethiopia and Somalia.Ferrand: I would add that, compared to the mega swarms of 2020, the swarms now being treated by government teams run from a few hectares to 30 hectares and contain far fewer insects. Remember last year there was one swarm in northern Kenya that was around 2 000 square kilometres in size. Now, daily missions in Kenya are down to one or two a day at the very most, compared to 20 at the peak of the upsurge last year.Are you saying the locust crisis is over?Cressman: Absolutely not! Given the right conditions, Desert Locusts are a biological time bomb. They are also professional survivalists and know how to manage weather conditions in a changing climate. We have been surprised twice during this upsurge by atypical weather that dumped unusually heavy amounts of precipitation out of season and sparked an explosion of reproduction.It would be a fatal error to scale down the response now. On the contrary, surveillance missions should be ramped up, to lock in gains and detect any upticks in locust activity, if the weather does have any more tricks up its sleeve. The maximum number of ground teams must be out actively searching for locust infestations. All control teams must remain ready to react. If current trends continue, operations might be able to come off “high alert status” perhaps after the summer.Ferrand: Exactly. So much has been gained. But we see that the governments of the region are determined to safeguard these achievements now that the people of East Africa are starting to see the light at the end of the tunnel. Now, countries have systems in place, teams in place, and are maintaining a state of full readiness.What happens if surprise weather does provoke another round of breeding?Ferrand: The countries in the region are ready. In one year they went from having very little expertise or capacity to deal with desert locust invasions to a state of very high preparedness. So an enduring legacy of this joint campaign is a very enhanced national locust response preparedness capacity that will benefit East Africa in the future.How are environmental and safety concerns associated with anti-locust pesticides addressed?Ferrand: First of all, of course FAO and the affected countries understand concerns over the environment and safety. This has been a top priority from before the operations even began.Before an air control operation is conducted, the environment is mapped, including settlements, water bodies, wildlife and conservancies for example. Wind direction and speed are assessed and factored in. If swarms are too close to water bodies or the wind direction risk to drift pesticides to water bodies, the operation is cancelled. Spraying has taken place largely on arid land, avoiding potential leaching to water systems. On many occasions operations have to be aborted because the proper conditions are not met.Cressman: Managing Desert Locusts in order to prevent plagues is one of FAO’s original mandates since our founding in 1947, so we have deep experience in this challenging issue.Over the years, FAO and a range of partners working on Desert Locust management have developed standard operating protocols to guide the planning and execution of control campaigns. Best practices call for exact targeting, precision spraying, and close monitoring so that control operations apply pesticides in a responsible, effective and safe way. Control teams use ultra-low volume formulations very tightly targeted and follow a range of protocols and standard best practices. These are the recommendations we have been driving home from day one.Are there alternatives?Cressman: It is widely accepted that the only effective strategy for responding to a Desert Locust upsurge of this magnitude is one that utilizes approved-for-use pesticides. There is just no other way to do it, and the consequences of inaction in terms of the destruction to food crops and pastures in a region already beset by high levels of food insecurity are just unacceptable.Yes, chemical pesticides used in control can pose risks to human and animal health. Risks can be managed by taking the necessary precautionary measures and strictly following the correct application methods.Biological alternatives do exist, but they may not be available in suitable quantities and fast enough when swarms are so vast. By the way, FAO and our government partners did use biopesticides in this current upsurge, when circumstances made use of this slower-acting solution viable.Moving forward, extensive research is underway on biological control and other means of non-chemical control of locusts. The current focus is on pathogens and insect growth regulators. Thus far, control by natural predators and parasites is limited, as locusts easily outnumber their enemies during upsurges and swarms easily migrate away, leaving them behind.Ferrand: I would just add that we have worked closely with the government teams to provide training in best practices. Something like 4 000 training manuals and leaflets were distributed across the region after users and actors were exposed to standard operating procedures. Environmental impact assessments have been ongoing. A partnership involving FAO, other UN agencies and regional NGOs has developed community information material in various local languages on safety and best practices. Things like posters, radio announcements, booklets, animations and text messages have been widely disseminated.Again, we completely understand the concern. All concerns or reports from communities have been carefully investigated and we are pleased to report that we did not face environmental or health incidents in the region. But I would also point to what these operations have achieved in terms of preventing human suffering.Locust control operations prevented the loss of 4 million tonnes of cereal and 790 million litres of milk production, protecting the food security of 34.2 million people and avoiding $1.54 billion in cereal and milk losses. /Public Release. This material comes from the originating organization and may be of a point-in-time nature, edited for clarity, style and length. View in full here. Why?Well, unlike many news organisations, we have no sponsors, no corporate or ideological interests. We don’t put up a paywall – we believe in free access to information of public interest. Media ownership in Australia is one of the most concentrated in the world (Learn more). Since the trend of consolidation is and has historically been upward, fewer and fewer individuals or organizations control increasing shares of the mass media in our country. According to independent assessment, about 98% of the media sector is held by three conglomerates. This tendency is not only totally unacceptable, but also to a degree frightening). Learn more hereWe endeavour to provide the community with real-time access to true unfiltered news firsthand from primary sources. It is a bumpy road with all sorties of difficulties. We can only achieve this goal together. Our website is open to any citizen journalists and organizations who want to contribute, publish high-quality insights or send media releases to improve public access to impartial information. You and we have the right to know, learn, read, hear what and how we deem appropriate.Your support is greatly appreciated. All donations are kept completely private and confidential.Thank you in advance!Tags:Africa, Agriculture, biological, environment, Ethiopia, explosion, FAO, Government, interview, Keith, Kenya, operation, production, reproduction, Somalia, surveillance, UNlast_img read more

Car carriers on the up

first_imgCar carrier shipping is expected to continue its recovery from the trough of 2016, adds Drewry, explaining that this is supported by improving utilisation rates.However, in its Finished Vehicle Shipping Annual Review and Forecast, the consultancy pointed to increasing localisation and the threat of trade wars slowing the sector’s growth, while carrier operational efficiency will be challenged by the emergence of new trades and ports of call.“Despite improving utilisation and a record low orderbook, owners and operators are holding off acquiring capacity, whether through ordering, sales and purchase or chartered in tonnage, as trade uncertainty weighs on the market,” said Tom Ossieur, head of car carriers at Drewry.“Overall, car carrier efficiency has fallen by 39 percent since 2007 as vessels sail at slower speeds and spend more time in ports,” said Ossieur. “Drewry does not foresee significant improvements forthcoming. Lower speeds, shorter routes and trade lane imbalances are here to stay.”While in recent years operators have ordered more flexible vessel designs, some are shunning fleet additions in favour of port and land-side logistics investments that offer better read more

Firm in ‘clear breach of trust’ over multi-million-pound property deal

first_imgA law firm acting in a property transaction paid out more than £500,000 to vendors in a ‘clear breach of trust’ and has ‘no realistic prospect of showing otherwise’ at trial, the High Court has concluded.In Levack & Anor v Philip Ross & Co (a firm) & Anor the court said there is no compelling reason why the case against London firm Philip Ross & Co should go to trial.The case, an application for summary judgment by businessman Paul Levack, hinges around a property transaction in which Philip Ross consultant David Connick acted as the solicitor for Levack and another individual, John Moeller. Levack and Moeller agreed to jointly buy a multi-million-pound property (referred to as the Alie Street property).Levack’s company, APL, paid £5.1m to Philip Ross’s client account (50% of the purchase price). According to the judgment, the monies were paid in two tranches: £500,000 in February 2015 (the deposit monies), and £4.6m in April 2015 (the completion monies).Philip Ross subsequently paid the deposit monies to fund the deposit. The payment was made in the name of Moeller’s investment vehicle, Katalina Global Limited (KGL).Connick advised Levack that the contract was held by KGL as nominee for a joint venture between Levack or APL and KGL. Philip Ross later paid the completion monies to the solicitors for the property vendors on behalf of an ‘off-the-shelf company’ called DDL that had been acquired by Connick on behalf of Moeller/KGL.KGL became the sole registered shareholder and Moeller became the sole director of DDL and, through that company with the assistance of Connick, borrowed substantial sums against the Alie Street property to fund his share of the completion monies. Moeller/DDL then defaulted on these loans. The property was subsequently repossessed by DDL’s lenders and then sold, with all proceeds of sale being paid to the lenders.The claimants submit that Connick gave express commitments that Philip Ross would only pay the money out when authorised to do so by the claimants and for the purpose of funding the acquisition of the property for the ‘joint and equal benefit of the claimants and Moeller’.Philip Ross submitted it had a good arguable defence.But Lionel Percy QC, sitting as a judge in the High Court, rejected this: ‘Connick does not dispute that he transferred the deposit monies to the vendors’ solicitors without taking any steps to ensure that they would be used for the joint and equal benefit of the claimants and Moeller/KGL. Indeed, he simply does not address this important matter in his evidence. Put shortly, Connick did not do what he undertook to do … and what, in all of the circumstances, he should have done. This was, in my judgment, a clear breach of trust.’He added: ‘The parties should seek to agree an appropriate draft order reflecting my findings. My present view is that it is appropriate for me to give declaratory relief in favour of both claimants and a monetary judgment in favour of APL although the parties have leave to address me on this should they disagree.’Moeller and DDL were not parties to the application. A spokesperson for Philip Ross & Co said: ’The firm is disappointed by the decision reached by the court and we are considering our position in relation to appealing the judgment.’last_img read more